+- One2bay-Forum (https://www.one2bay.de/forum)
+-- Forum: One2Bay.de (https://www.one2bay.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Ankündigungen / News (https://www.one2bay.de/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thema: xdiw How California is tackling the increasing threat of mudslides (/showthread.php?tid=450749)
xdiw How California is tackling the increasing threat of mudslides - Morrisssoant - 12-27-2024
Jpug WATCH: Biden says he s taking a hard look at student loan forgiveness
WASHINGTON 鈥?President-elect Donald Trump supports completion of the disputed Dakota Access oil pipeline in the Midwest, based on policy and not the billionaire businessman investments in a partnership building the $3.8 billion pipeline, according to an aide memo.Spokesman Bryan Lanza said in a memo this week to supporters that Trump backing for the pipeline near a North Dakota Indian reservation has nothing to do with his personal investments an stanley cup d everything to do with promoting policies that benefit all Americans.The Associated Press obtained a copy of the memo.Trump most recent federal disclosure forms, filed in May, show he owned a small amount of stock in Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners, the pipeline builder, and at least $100,000 in Phillips 66, an energy company that owns one-quarter of the pipeline.Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks said in response to an AP story last week that it is her understanding Trump recently so stanley cup ld his Energy Transfer stock, but she provided no details. Neither Hicks nor other Trump aides have responde stanley cup d to repeated requests for information since then.In a 17-page memo to campaign supporters and congressional staff, Trump transition team says Trump intends to cut the bureaucratic red tape put in place by the Obama administration that has prevented our country from diversifying our energy portfolio.The four-state Dakota Access pipeline is part of that strategy, the memo says. Then, Jwrc Trump pushes back on McConnell claim of excessive expectations on health care
ALBANY, N.Y. AP 鈥?A proposed amendment to New Yorks constitution barring discrimination based on gender identity and pregnancy outcomes cannot appear on the state ballot in November because legislators made a procedural error during an initial round of approval, a judge ruled Tuesday.The ruling from state Supreme Court Justice Daniel J. Doyle found lawmakers incorrectly approved the language before getting a written opinion from the attorney general.The decision removes a politically charged question from the November ballot that both Republicans and Democrats hoped would drive turnout.Democrats passed the proposed constitutional amendment last year to bar discrimination based on pregnancy outcomes or gender expression, putting the change to voter airmax s in the 2024 election for final approval.The amendment wouldnt explicitly preserve a womans right to have an abortion. Instead, it would effectively prevent someone from being discriminated against for having the procedure, though backers stanley cup have said it would have the practical effect of protecting reproductive rights.READ MORE: Vatican characterizes gender-affirming surgery, surrogacy as violations of human dignityThe ruling is a blow to Democrats in New York who have sought to spur voter turnout by framing key battleground House races around abortion access, betting that their base would be encouraged to cast a ballot to protect abortion rights following the overturning of Roe v. Wade.The New Yo adidas campus rk Constitution curren