01-05-2025, 09:48 PM
Ulxl German police arrest 93-year-old Auschwitz guard
On Friday Australias drugs regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, approved the Pfizer Covid vaccine for children aged 12 to 15 years. This means the independent experts that advise the TGA have assessed enough of the international evidence, where children are already being vaccinated, to feel confident the vaccine is safe for this age group.Previously, the Pfizer vaccine had only been approved for use in Australia for people aged 16 years and over. So what happens next, and when can children be vaccinated with Pfizer Not all children will be eligible at onceAs with all vaccination decisions, the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation [Atagi] will now consider the TGA approval and provide expert advice on which groups of adol stanley quencher escents sh stanley flask ould be prioritised for the rollout. They will also give advice about how and when it should be administer stanley botella ed, for example through GPS, in-school programs, or vaccination hubs.Atagi members include independent epidemiologists, nurses, infectious diseases physicians, consumer advocates and public health experts, and they meet with global experts to help inform their advice to government. The national Covid-19 Vaccines Taskforce has already begun planning how to logistically support the rollout of the vaccine to children to avoid any delay once the Atagi advice is finalised.Atagi might decide that immunocompromised children with pre-existing health conditions, or those living with and helping to care for vulnerable adults, sho Zhmx Chris Packham begins legal case to halt HS2 amid coronavirus crisis
The court of protection keeps a low profile: its default setting, prescribed by statute, is privacy; its hearings take place behind closed doors and when its decisions are published the parties are not usually identified.The very strong, it has to be said, justification for this secrecy is that people who don t have the mental capacity to make choices about their day-to-day affairs are entitled to the same degree of privacy as those who do. The unfortunate byproducts of this system are an alphabet soup of obscure judgments and an absence of public scrutiny of some important issues of wider concern. The case of E, which was spotted by the Press Association s legal editor on the Bailii website, is a case in point.At a hearing in March, the court ruled that E, a 19-year-old with severe learning disabilities, was unlawfully deprived of his liberty, in breach of Articles 5 and 8 of the European court of hum stanley tumblers an rights, when an unnamed local authority removed him from the family home of a woman F who had fostered him for more than a decade. The local authority neither complied wi stanley termoska th legislation nor sought an order from the court of protection, as it should have done, when it placed E first in emergency respite care, then in a residential care home owned by a company referred to in the judgment as X Ltd.Mr Ju stanley becher stice Baker described E s removal from F s care as an arbitrary act and said the local authority s deplorable failure to take into account the close relat
On Friday Australias drugs regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, approved the Pfizer Covid vaccine for children aged 12 to 15 years. This means the independent experts that advise the TGA have assessed enough of the international evidence, where children are already being vaccinated, to feel confident the vaccine is safe for this age group.Previously, the Pfizer vaccine had only been approved for use in Australia for people aged 16 years and over. So what happens next, and when can children be vaccinated with Pfizer Not all children will be eligible at onceAs with all vaccination decisions, the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation [Atagi] will now consider the TGA approval and provide expert advice on which groups of adol stanley quencher escents sh stanley flask ould be prioritised for the rollout. They will also give advice about how and when it should be administer stanley botella ed, for example through GPS, in-school programs, or vaccination hubs.Atagi members include independent epidemiologists, nurses, infectious diseases physicians, consumer advocates and public health experts, and they meet with global experts to help inform their advice to government. The national Covid-19 Vaccines Taskforce has already begun planning how to logistically support the rollout of the vaccine to children to avoid any delay once the Atagi advice is finalised.Atagi might decide that immunocompromised children with pre-existing health conditions, or those living with and helping to care for vulnerable adults, sho Zhmx Chris Packham begins legal case to halt HS2 amid coronavirus crisis
The court of protection keeps a low profile: its default setting, prescribed by statute, is privacy; its hearings take place behind closed doors and when its decisions are published the parties are not usually identified.The very strong, it has to be said, justification for this secrecy is that people who don t have the mental capacity to make choices about their day-to-day affairs are entitled to the same degree of privacy as those who do. The unfortunate byproducts of this system are an alphabet soup of obscure judgments and an absence of public scrutiny of some important issues of wider concern. The case of E, which was spotted by the Press Association s legal editor on the Bailii website, is a case in point.At a hearing in March, the court ruled that E, a 19-year-old with severe learning disabilities, was unlawfully deprived of his liberty, in breach of Articles 5 and 8 of the European court of hum stanley tumblers an rights, when an unnamed local authority removed him from the family home of a woman F who had fostered him for more than a decade. The local authority neither complied wi stanley termoska th legislation nor sought an order from the court of protection, as it should have done, when it placed E first in emergency respite care, then in a residential care home owned by a company referred to in the judgment as X Ltd.Mr Ju stanley becher stice Baker described E s removal from F s care as an arbitrary act and said the local authority s deplorable failure to take into account the close relat