11-15-2024, 10:46 AM
Cmym Immigration Protests Grip U.S. Cities
Few issues spark debate more than immigration, because people connect i stanley quencher t to so many aspects of society: from economics and culture, to law and resources, as well as to what one believes a stanley cup bout people who are immigrating in the first place.So considering all that, what do people want U.S. policy generally to be right now Let s look at what s behind each of three broad views: those who say they d stop most or all immigration now this group is one in five Americans mdash; 21% ; those who would allow some immigration, based on strict criteria this is by far the largest of thr stanley becher ee, a majority 58% of Americans, though exactly what that criteria ought to be is itself a matter for discussion, which we ll cover below ; and those who would allow a lot of immigration, including for most or all who want to enter the U.S. this is another 21%, counterbalancing the most restrictive group. The people giving these responses differ somewhat in how they see both immigrants and immigration s impact mdash; here s more on each: People who d allow some immigration, with criteriaThe largest group of Americans, those who say they would allow some immigration, starts with a mainly positive impression of who immigrants are, at least in one sense: about eight in 10 of them see immigrants as generally hard-working, and most say they re part of what makes America special. In terms of economic impact, most say immigrants fil Uzjy Column: America Brings World Down As Economy Keeps Failing
National advocacy groups for minorities are criticizing a new federal policy that bans racial profiling, saying it s not tough enough to end the practice.The guidelines, issued by the Justice Department last week, prohibit federal law enforcement officers from using race or ethnicity in routine activities such as traffic stops. But they allow officers to consider those factors in preventing threats to national security mdash; an exception attacked by several groups. They ve left open a number of loopholes, said Hussein Ibish, a spokesman for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. This directive has no teeth. I stanley cup nz t says, Racial profiling, no, no, no. It doe stanley cup sn t actually provide any means to stop it. Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo defended the guidelines. He said attorneys studied the issue very carefully in order to craft a policy that they think is morally right, legally right, practically right and constitutionally sound. Among the policy s other shortcomings, according to black, Hispanic, Muslim, Asian-American an stanley cup d Arab-American advocacy groups: mdash; It doesn t require agencies to monitor their own compliance and fails to provide redress for people who have been profiled. Corallo acknowledged that s not in the policy, but said people can report problems to the Justice Department s civil rights division or the inspector general s office, as they have in the past.mdash; It doesn t call for collecting d
Few issues spark debate more than immigration, because people connect i stanley quencher t to so many aspects of society: from economics and culture, to law and resources, as well as to what one believes a stanley cup bout people who are immigrating in the first place.So considering all that, what do people want U.S. policy generally to be right now Let s look at what s behind each of three broad views: those who say they d stop most or all immigration now this group is one in five Americans mdash; 21% ; those who would allow some immigration, based on strict criteria this is by far the largest of thr stanley becher ee, a majority 58% of Americans, though exactly what that criteria ought to be is itself a matter for discussion, which we ll cover below ; and those who would allow a lot of immigration, including for most or all who want to enter the U.S. this is another 21%, counterbalancing the most restrictive group. The people giving these responses differ somewhat in how they see both immigrants and immigration s impact mdash; here s more on each: People who d allow some immigration, with criteriaThe largest group of Americans, those who say they would allow some immigration, starts with a mainly positive impression of who immigrants are, at least in one sense: about eight in 10 of them see immigrants as generally hard-working, and most say they re part of what makes America special. In terms of economic impact, most say immigrants fil Uzjy Column: America Brings World Down As Economy Keeps Failing
National advocacy groups for minorities are criticizing a new federal policy that bans racial profiling, saying it s not tough enough to end the practice.The guidelines, issued by the Justice Department last week, prohibit federal law enforcement officers from using race or ethnicity in routine activities such as traffic stops. But they allow officers to consider those factors in preventing threats to national security mdash; an exception attacked by several groups. They ve left open a number of loopholes, said Hussein Ibish, a spokesman for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. This directive has no teeth. I stanley cup nz t says, Racial profiling, no, no, no. It doe stanley cup sn t actually provide any means to stop it. Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo defended the guidelines. He said attorneys studied the issue very carefully in order to craft a policy that they think is morally right, legally right, practically right and constitutionally sound. Among the policy s other shortcomings, according to black, Hispanic, Muslim, Asian-American an stanley cup d Arab-American advocacy groups: mdash; It doesn t require agencies to monitor their own compliance and fails to provide redress for people who have been profiled. Corallo acknowledged that s not in the policy, but said people can report problems to the Justice Department s civil rights division or the inspector general s office, as they have in the past.mdash; It doesn t call for collecting d